It all started with separation anxiety. Usually that phrase is used in dogs, but in this case it is used before any dogs come in the picture.
So sometimes the wife works weekends and it is still hard to get that into your head no matter how many times it has occurred or how much you're mentally prepared yourself. It's just a weird notion to be home alone on weekends wondering what to do even though you have a pile of tasks on your todo list.
You start having separation anxiety! It does weird things to you. Restlessness, acute laziness, in a sense of lost. You cease to be functional. And so comes the idea of getting a puppy... err.. to fill in the gap.
So there I was, going around googling on the breed of puppies and breeders in the area, checking out pet shops and what not. Made a call to one of the breeders of Yorkshires and Min. Schnauzers (cute little things they are) to check out her puppies.
Got back and started doing more research when I stumbled upon this BBC documentary of pedigrees. Apparently the body that governs and publishes the breed standard in the U.K. is the Kennel Club. Now they publishes a standard that says what are the distinct features of each particular breed of dogs, basically what makes them desirable or not.
Apparently, the breeding selection criteria has somehow morphed since the 18th centuries from working function to purely aesthetics even at the expense of health.
One of the examples cited was the Rhodesian Ridgebacks, MRI shows that the ridge is actually a deformed spine. And yet, this particular genetic deformity is published as the distinctive feature of the breed. "Normal" puppies without ridges weren't desired.
Pekingese were breed for their flat faces even though it causes breathing problems.
Quote from their website:
"The programme shows a prize-winning cavalier King Charles spaniel suffering from syringomyelia, a condition which occurs when a dog's skull is too small for its brain.
It also features boxers suffering from epilepsy, pugs with breathing problems and bulldogs who are unable to mate or give birth unassisted.
It says deliberate mating of dogs which are close relatives is common practice and the Kennel Club registers dogs bred from mother-to-son and brother-to-sister matings.
HAVE YOUR SAYThere are some breeds of dogs which are "abominations"
Scientists at Imperial College, London, recently found that pugs in the UK are so inbred that although there are 10,000 of them, it is the equivalent of just 50 distinct individuals.
Unquote
The fact that a lady had to campaign for 3 years to get a meeting with all the parties, the Kennel Club, breeders, the representative from the ministry in-charge, and comes out changing no one's minds just shows that there seems to be a systematic denial.
The Kennel Club knows it exists, the breeders do but they just won't budge for the health of the animals. They rather continue breeding hereditary diseases for the sake of looks rather than base them upon the health of the dogs. It IS saddening to see that something so trivially logical can be faced with so much resistance in a country where civilization has existed for a much longer time than most.
It then got me thinking about humans. Aren't we the same? Aren't we all faced with the same kind of problems? Simple logical truths are twisted and lies thrown in to create confusion, all in a systematic denial of the facts. I am convinced that it is in the interest of whoever in power to keep people dumb and ignorant. If I were to be a leader of a country, and sitting in a conference with other world leaders, I could definitely imagine the conversation arising on how to systematically deny the people of knowledge to toe them in line for the sake of staying in power.
Aren't we all pedigrees of a consuming breed? Created merely to keep the rich richer.
So back to the dogs, the problem that has been created by humans is that it is no longer a natural selection process, breeding has created a new selection criteria for these dogs. It is no longer the survival of the fittest but the survival (or lack of) of the pretty, even when sacrificing health.
Now, aren't humans the same? Are we still living in a world where the fittest survive? In some ways, the advancement of health sciences has allowed more people to live longer and reproduce when they might not have been able to otherwise. We have altered the natural selection criteria for humans!
It is no longer the survival of the fittest, so then it got me thinking... what is our survival selection criteria? It is money. The rich can afford expensive medical treatments and medication. What then makes a person rich? It is the propensity to forgo morality for personal gain. I mean, think of it, the top 10 richest people in the world don't make it there by being healthy or are they moral saints. They make it there by their willingness to make money out of someone else.
We are in essence breeding more humans who are morally corrupt! It's the survival of the greediest.
Let's face it, there are no long standing politicians who isn't rich and who doesn't have some kind of business in related fields.
The world is so wrong, in so many ways.